(RNS) In 2001, then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger urged Pope John Paul II to create a central system to further the Vatican’s investigations of sexual abuse under priests. He shifted control of the disposition of the cases from the Congregation for the Clergy, where little action had been taken, to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which Ratzinger then headed.
And every week he examined the grueling cases — coming chiefly from the U.S.
“He used to call that weekly meeting … his penance,” said Greg Erlandson, co-author of “Pope Benedict XVI and the Sexual Abuse Crisis: Working for Reform and Renewal.” Erlandson and church historian Matthew Bunson say, in their book, that Pope Benedict XVI “arguably was probably the most knowledgeable man on the abuse crisis.”
As cases of sexual abuse continued to make headlines, the man who became Pope Benedict XVI has at times publicly addressed the issue and even met with victims, beginning with five victims from the Archdiocese of Boston, where the abuse scandal first made global headlines.
But victims’ advocates remain skeptical and critical over his handling of the matter, particularly the failure to punish bishops who protected abusers rather than children and teens.
“When forced to, he talks about the crimes but ignores the cover-ups, uses the past tense as if to suggest it’s not still happening,” said David Clohessy, the executive director of the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests. “He has vast powers and he’s done very little to make a difference.”
In the U.S. alone, the abuse scandal offers horrifying statistics. According to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Office of Child and Youth Protection and independent studies commissioned by the bishops, there have been:
More than 6,100 accused priests since 1950.
More than 16,000 victims identified to date, although there is no national database.
$2.5 billion in settlements and therapy bills for victims, attorneys fees and costs to care for priests pulled out of ministry from 2004 to 2011.
His meetings with victims are viewed by some as “merely public relations.”
“These gestures were cynical and, in a way cruel, because they gave survivors and Catholics the illusion that he was a reformer,” said Anne Barrett Doyle, co-director of the watchdog group BishopAccountability.org.
Terence McKiernan, president of BishopAccountability.org, said he believes Benedict and others involved in allegedly covering up the scandal did not allow themselves to be truly affected by the survivors. He believes the meetings were too highly controlled to really break down any emotional walls.
“Anyone who has worked with survivors feels that those relationships are a privilege and that they do change your life,” McKiernan said. “The brief encounters the pope has had with survivors hasn’t been life changing because he’s continued to function the way he has.”
While Erlandson acknowledges that the visits weren’t able to undo victims’ emotional damage, he says the meetings were a step forward for the Vatican.
“(Visiting victims) is a powerful experience of humility and in that sense, also, he was modeling for the rest of the church and for church leaders how they should behave, and so I think that was powerful,” Erlandson said.
Greater transparency by publishing lists of predator priests would help the Vatican move past “just lip service,” said Kevin Waldrip, a victim of predatory priest sexual abuse and volunteer for Road to Recovery, an organization that helps victims of clergy sexual abuse.
“I wanted to become a priest and that changed in a day,” Waldrip said, referencing his abuse the day before his 13th birthday. “I felt that not only had I been violated by this priest, that I knew and loved, but I had been violated by God.”
In the U.S., 30 bishops have released the names of predator priests on their diocesan websites. Victims’ advocates continue to call for the Vatican to follow suit by releasing files and documentation of clergy sexual abuse. Doing so could allow victims to heal and gain closure, said Mitchell Garabedian, a Boston lawyer who has represented sexual abuse victims of more than 40 different priests.
Doyle said she believes the church’s inability for action has only further suppressed actions to stop sexual abuse. Last September, Bishop Robert Finn of Kansas City, Mo., was found guilty of failing to tell authorities about a priest suspected of sexually exploiting children. Finn was the first U.S. bishop convicted of protecting a priest in a sexual abuse case. Finn remains in office.
“Pope Benedict left a convicted felon in office,” Doyle said. (Finn actually pleaded guilty to a single misdemeanor.)
For decades, it was standard procedure for church officials to keep abuse secret. And those years are explored in disturbing and dramatic detail in a new HBO documentary, “Mea Maxima Culpa: Silence in the House of God,” which went into broadcast rotation on the cable network a week ago.
It is directed by Oscar winner Alex Gibney and voiced by Hollywood stars including Bradley Cooper and Ethan Hawke. Also named in the credits is one of the narrators, prize-winning New York Times religion reporter Laurie Goodstein, whose coverage of rampant abuse of deaf children at a school in Wisconsin became an international sensation.
The unifying claim of the documentary is that the Catholic Church, from the papacy to the smallest parish, has been focused on protecting the institution, not the youth.
In the documentary — as in California this month where retired Cardinal Roger Mahony was rebuked by the current archbishop of Los Angeles — only court-ordered releases of documents have enabled victims to trace what the church knew and when people with the power to call the police, defrock priests or reach out to victims, failed to act.
Almost every example in the film traces eventually to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Ratzinger. The Vatican did not respond to the filmmakers’ requests for interviews.